Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sharon Rousseau's avatar

Indigenous racism on full display by Rustad’s now 3 ex-BC Cons. John Rustad should have nipped it in the bud day one and booted them, but power greed must have kept him quiet.

Why would the Rustad tent welcome bigots knowing they denied Residential School burial sites exist‼️ He should make the Academy Award nominated Sugar Cane documentary mandatory education for his MLAs. Spoiler alert, it ends with the priest with a shovel hitting a coffin outside graveyard.

When you hear “Woke” aka anti-DEI look to actions. Harper Cons Danielle Smith & Scott Moe passed discriminatory provincial legislation on anti-Diversity/Equity/Inclusion. AKA anti-Canadian, pro Musk/Trump, pro IDU fascism/pro-autocracy. They even went after vulnerable LGTBQ+ kids taking away their right to healthcare based on a debunked conservative backed trans health study.

John’s commitment to Harper’s Reform Party and Canada Project 2025 is unwavering, keep calling them out. We all know Poilievre feels about Indigenous peoples, he shares the views of Brodie.

Like Brodie, didn’t Poilievre blame First Nations for burning down 100 churches? Anyone (non-indigenous rape victims) could have took action after watching the churches protect some opportunistic pedophiles/murderers (rape victim babies burned in ovens) for decades.

We all know how badly reconciliation will be treated if Harper/Poilievre govt returns to power, calls to action would stop.

https://macleans.ca/culture/sugarcane-documentary-oscar/

MIKI's avatar

As I read this I was both appalled at the ignorance and hate but also left wondering what do they mean by their claims that Reconciliation ( they use a small ‘r’ I noted) has interfered with business? In the interest of democracy and open debate, I feel that we need to address their accusations full on. In this moment in time we all seem to be speaking to the converted yet how do we reach the uncertain? Without listening to and addressing their concerns, they will continue to dig in their heels and try to convert the undecided. Are there any valid points from their assertions and if so, do they actually harm Indigenous people? If there is a corruption as they claim, would Reconciliation be better served by bringing both sides to the table? I know that a spidey sense sniffs bigotry, but can some bigots be calmed? Can a counterpoint prevent conversion of more bigotry? Can opening up the discussion actually make Reconciliation the beautiful thing many of us want so badly?

3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?